<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Spam or Welcome Innovation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/</link>
	<description>Mostly Software, Sometimes Business, Always Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shonna Mccaig</title>
		<link>http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-18249</link>
		<dc:creator>Shonna Mccaig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 01:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/?p=79#comment-18249</guid>
		<description>Fed up with obtaining low amounts of useless traffic to your site? Well i want to share with you a brand new underground tactic that makes me personally $900  on a daily basis on 100% AUTOPILOT. I possibly could be here all day and going into detail but why dont you merely check their site out? There is really a excellent video that explains everything. So if your seriously interested in producing hassle-free hard cash this is the site for you. &lt;a href="http://tiny.cc/p7mq4" rel="nofollow"&gt;Auto Traffic Avalanche&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fed up with obtaining low amounts of useless traffic to your site? Well i want to share with you a brand new underground tactic that makes me personally $900  on a daily basis on 100% AUTOPILOT. I possibly could be here all day and going into detail but why dont you merely check their site out? There is really a excellent video that explains everything. So if your seriously interested in producing hassle-free hard cash this is the site for you. <a href="http://tiny.cc/p7mq4" rel="nofollow">Auto Traffic Avalanche</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-17982</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/?p=79#comment-17982</guid>
		<description>Mebbe I'm atavistic, but seems to me auto-follow / auto-respond just dehumanizes ... yet again / more.

So yaa, the video is *cough* really neat. (Original? Breakthrough? Revolutionary? Let's not get carried away.)
But yaa, I'd say auto-respond is evidence of "don't get it".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mebbe I&#8217;m atavistic, but seems to me auto-follow / auto-respond just dehumanizes &#8230; yet again / more.</p>
<p>So yaa, the video is *cough* really neat. (Original? Breakthrough? Revolutionary? Let&#8217;s not get carried away.)<br />
But yaa, I&#8217;d say auto-respond is evidence of &#8220;don&#8217;t get it&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh McCormack</title>
		<link>http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-16964</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh McCormack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/?p=79#comment-16964</guid>
		<description>I think the video is a clever idea. 
I'm not a blogger, or social media maven, I own a company that builds social networks. As such I try to stay current with what's going on, and stay connected, but my ideas about successful uses of social networking sites is not always the same as other people's. 

With Twitter I'm loathe to follow people with tons and tons of connections. I don't really see much to brag about if you have thousands of followers, and I think auto following in return suggests it doesn't really matter to you whether you follow someone or not. I looked at your tweets and you respond to people - evidence that you're using Twitter not as a broadcast medium, but as a social one.

I find a lot of the people who brag about the number of followers they have are broadcasters, and their thank you for following messages typically sound like a "thanks for tuning in" sort of thing. Your video said something else entirely. I think it's a great idea. I'm going to do one myself, and maybe even try to do personalized ones sometimes, too (as suggested by another commenter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the video is a clever idea.<br />
I&#8217;m not a blogger, or social media maven, I own a company that builds social networks. As such I try to stay current with what&#8217;s going on, and stay connected, but my ideas about successful uses of social networking sites is not always the same as other people&#8217;s. </p>
<p>With Twitter I&#8217;m loathe to follow people with tons and tons of connections. I don&#8217;t really see much to brag about if you have thousands of followers, and I think auto following in return suggests it doesn&#8217;t really matter to you whether you follow someone or not. I looked at your tweets and you respond to people - evidence that you&#8217;re using Twitter not as a broadcast medium, but as a social one.</p>
<p>I find a lot of the people who brag about the number of followers they have are broadcasters, and their thank you for following messages typically sound like a &#8220;thanks for tuning in&#8221; sort of thing. Your video said something else entirely. I think it&#8217;s a great idea. I&#8217;m going to do one myself, and maybe even try to do personalized ones sometimes, too (as suggested by another commenter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May C</title>
		<link>http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-16963</link>
		<dc:creator>May C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/?p=79#comment-16963</guid>
		<description>I don't see any problem with it.  Probably, you could explain or indicate it's a 30 sec self intro video.  I think the negative video was a reaction that it was not a personal video but something him/her interpreted as something a bit over self promoting?  I don't know.  I have no problems.  But then, I watched the video after reading this post and BEFORE following you, so that could have made a bit of difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any problem with it.  Probably, you could explain or indicate it&#8217;s a 30 sec self intro video.  I think the negative video was a reaction that it was not a personal video but something him/her interpreted as something a bit over self promoting?  I don&#8217;t know.  I have no problems.  But then, I watched the video after reading this post and BEFORE following you, so that could have made a bit of difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jensen</title>
		<link>http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-16962</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/?p=79#comment-16962</guid>
		<description>Brian -

No one ever made a statue for a critic.  I wouldn't worry about those who criticize your approach.  I thought it was a nice touch.

I've been accused of sending Twitter Spam, but I don't worry about it.  In fact, the person who was vocal about it actually ALSO sent ME an autoresponse using Social Too.

I actually use a different autoresponder for my welcome tweets.  And I definately DON'T include any links or "find out more about ME" stuff in my response.  Mine is cordial and rather generic in nature.

I find that one good rule of thumb with Twitter is to only follow those who follow you back within 24-48 hours.  After all, relationships are a two-way thing.  So I auto-follow anyone who follows me.  And I go back and unfollow those who don't follow me within 24-48 hours.  

I rarely click the links in people's DM's to me, because I think it smells of "It's all about me".  With you I made an exception, because you said 3 key things:

1.  30 seconds - good length
2.  video - good choice
3.  introduction - good concept 

It was short, to the point, video, and you labeled it an introduction.  Very good psychology.

Thanks, Brian.  I am looking forward to reading and watching more of your stuff.

Tim Jensen

http://www.twitter.com/TimJensen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian -</p>
<p>No one ever made a statue for a critic.  I wouldn&#8217;t worry about those who criticize your approach.  I thought it was a nice touch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been accused of sending Twitter Spam, but I don&#8217;t worry about it.  In fact, the person who was vocal about it actually ALSO sent ME an autoresponse using Social Too.</p>
<p>I actually use a different autoresponder for my welcome tweets.  And I definately DON&#8217;T include any links or &#8220;find out more about ME&#8221; stuff in my response.  Mine is cordial and rather generic in nature.</p>
<p>I find that one good rule of thumb with Twitter is to only follow those who follow you back within 24-48 hours.  After all, relationships are a two-way thing.  So I auto-follow anyone who follows me.  And I go back and unfollow those who don&#8217;t follow me within 24-48 hours.  </p>
<p>I rarely click the links in people&#8217;s DM&#8217;s to me, because I think it smells of &#8220;It&#8217;s all about me&#8221;.  With you I made an exception, because you said 3 key things:</p>
<p>1.  30 seconds - good length<br />
2.  video - good choice<br />
3.  introduction - good concept </p>
<p>It was short, to the point, video, and you labeled it an introduction.  Very good psychology.</p>
<p>Thanks, Brian.  I am looking forward to reading and watching more of your stuff.</p>
<p>Tim Jensen</p>
<p><a href="http://www.twitter.com/TimJensen" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com/TimJensen</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-16960</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/?p=79#comment-16960</guid>
		<description>. . .  And I like your openness with the comments of the disgruntled among us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>. . .  And I like your openness with the comments of the disgruntled among us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-16959</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/?p=79#comment-16959</guid>
		<description>If the video had been longer than I would say no go.  To the contrary I liked it and immediately thought of how my main Twitter connection @Natuba could use this idea.  
Good Job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the video had been longer than I would say no go.  To the contrary I liked it and immediately thought of how my main Twitter connection @Natuba could use this idea.<br />
Good Job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-16958</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/?p=79#comment-16958</guid>
		<description>@Brian, I've also been using this method to welcome people to the @theworshipcomm twitter community. SO far I've only had 1 negative response, but that was in response to the way I shared it on my personal twitter account (@russhutto)

I sent out a tweet that went something like: twitter tip add an auto-response with a welcome video for a personal touch when new people follow you.

One person @replied and said something like: it's not personal if it's an auto-response...to which I replied, "touche, but the personal touch that I speak of is not necessarily in creating the auto-response and it going out, but in the fact that when people follow and view the video they have a glimpse into who the PERSON behind the twitter account is." To me that IS a personal touch.

Anyways, so far it's been working nicely. I think I implemented it Monday or Tuesday and I also got the idea from the same site you did after doing a search on maximizing twitter or something of the sort.

Great post.

My experiment here: &lt;a href="http://houseofjoy.info/russ/2008/12/twitter-tip-add-a-welcome-video-for-new-followers/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Post on Twitter Welcome Vid&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian, I&#8217;ve also been using this method to welcome people to the @theworshipcomm twitter community. SO far I&#8217;ve only had 1 negative response, but that was in response to the way I shared it on my personal twitter account (@russhutto)</p>
<p>I sent out a tweet that went something like: twitter tip add an auto-response with a welcome video for a personal touch when new people follow you.</p>
<p>One person @replied and said something like: it&#8217;s not personal if it&#8217;s an auto-response&#8230;to which I replied, &#8220;touche, but the personal touch that I speak of is not necessarily in creating the auto-response and it going out, but in the fact that when people follow and view the video they have a glimpse into who the PERSON behind the twitter account is.&#8221; To me that IS a personal touch.</p>
<p>Anyways, so far it&#8217;s been working nicely. I think I implemented it Monday or Tuesday and I also got the idea from the same site you did after doing a search on maximizing twitter or something of the sort.</p>
<p>Great post.</p>
<p>My experiment here: <a href="http://houseofjoy.info/russ/2008/12/twitter-tip-add-a-welcome-video-for-new-followers/" rel="nofollow">Post on Twitter Welcome Vid</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-16956</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/?p=79#comment-16956</guid>
		<description>Hi all, thanks for weighing in.  Andrea Hill, thanks for the honest feedback...I've decided to at the very least generalize the message in the DM as a result.

Michael, truth be told, I was taken aback by the sheer volume of links in your DM to me, and didn't check them out until having seen you mention them (publicly) to other users.

Andrea Mercado - That's a very good idea about setting your Twitter profile web link to an introductory video...I'm seriously considering switching to that.

I have to admit, it does bother me that anyone considers what I'm doing to be spam, even if you are in the minority.  What I find interesting is that the dissenters are more influential (as measured by # of twitter followers - in the thousands), though there have been similarly influential people who favor the video introduction as well (@jstorerj for example).  Additionally, I've had a certain dissenter who was privately seemingly very angry about it, though it is hard to discern tone from flat text on a screen.  Still, to think that I caused that disturbs me.  Regardless, perhaps the differences lie in the value system of the individuals involved.  Many appreciate cleverness over courtesy; others, vice versa.

Ben, that's a very insightful take on it.  The results show that option (A) does seemingly carry more weight with most people...but making a 'deep' connection is more valuable.  I've experienced it myself...I love that I've made real life connections with people I met on Twitter (the online magazine guy).

I guess what I'm after with this video introduction thing is to differentiate myself a bit from the regular user.  When I received a that video welcome, it made an impression on me, and I follow Alex Barger's tweets regularly as a result.  We've had good conversations on Twitter, and have a positive connection.  If he hadn't made that video, I'm not sure we would have had those valuable exchanges.  

I'm still mulling this all over, but I'm finding the discussion very interesting.  I sincerely thank you all for your comments and insights!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, thanks for weighing in.  Andrea Hill, thanks for the honest feedback&#8230;I&#8217;ve decided to at the very least generalize the message in the DM as a result.</p>
<p>Michael, truth be told, I was taken aback by the sheer volume of links in your DM to me, and didn&#8217;t check them out until having seen you mention them (publicly) to other users.</p>
<p>Andrea Mercado - That&#8217;s a very good idea about setting your Twitter profile web link to an introductory video&#8230;I&#8217;m seriously considering switching to that.</p>
<p>I have to admit, it does bother me that anyone considers what I&#8217;m doing to be spam, even if you are in the minority.  What I find interesting is that the dissenters are more influential (as measured by # of twitter followers - in the thousands), though there have been similarly influential people who favor the video introduction as well (@jstorerj for example).  Additionally, I&#8217;ve had a certain dissenter who was privately seemingly very angry about it, though it is hard to discern tone from flat text on a screen.  Still, to think that I caused that disturbs me.  Regardless, perhaps the differences lie in the value system of the individuals involved.  Many appreciate cleverness over courtesy; others, vice versa.</p>
<p>Ben, that&#8217;s a very insightful take on it.  The results show that option (A) does seemingly carry more weight with most people&#8230;but making a &#8216;deep&#8217; connection is more valuable.  I&#8217;ve experienced it myself&#8230;I love that I&#8217;ve made real life connections with people I met on Twitter (the online magazine guy).</p>
<p>I guess what I&#8217;m after with this video introduction thing is to differentiate myself a bit from the regular user.  When I received a that video welcome, it made an impression on me, and I follow Alex Barger&#8217;s tweets regularly as a result.  We&#8217;ve had good conversations on Twitter, and have a positive connection.  If he hadn&#8217;t made that video, I&#8217;m not sure we would have had those valuable exchanges.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still mulling this all over, but I&#8217;m finding the discussion very interesting.  I sincerely thank you all for your comments and insights!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christen Dybenko</title>
		<link>http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/2008/12/07/twitter-spam-or-welcome-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-16955</link>
		<dc:creator>Christen Dybenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinsontechnology.com/blog/?p=79#comment-16955</guid>
		<description>I think it's great. You're right on point with Guy Kawasaki's advice on how he uses SocialToo to auto follow his followers.

Your video just made it a bit more personal and transparent.  I just turned on SocialToo, but it hasn't been working for me yet, so I have to manually follow.

http://christen.dybenko.net/2008/12/08/twitter-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s great. You&#8217;re right on point with Guy Kawasaki&#8217;s advice on how he uses SocialToo to auto follow his followers.</p>
<p>Your video just made it a bit more personal and transparent.  I just turned on SocialToo, but it hasn&#8217;t been working for me yet, so I have to manually follow.</p>
<p><a href="http://christen.dybenko.net/2008/12/08/twitter-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/" rel="nofollow">http://christen.dybenko.net/2008/12/08/twitter-to-follow-or-not-to-follow/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
